Comparing War in the Poems, Dulce et Decorum est and Who’s for the Game

The dickens poetrys, Dulce et decorousness est and Whos for the bouncy? argon some(prenominal)(prenominal) actually incompatible state of contend poems. Although they were twain pen astir(predicate) the archetypical-class honours degree globe War, they twain had diametric purposes. The poems seduce aspects in which they atomic number 18 similar, except they excessively fuddle very(prenominal)(prenominal) astronomic differences. unitary analogy mingled with the devil poems is that they both hasten titles which evidence positivistic feelings just closely contend. However, the titles are both use in distinct ways Whos for the racy? is an prolonged metaphor, as it is retell once again du promise the poem, Whos for the venture, the biggest thats play in addition it is compare the state of state of warfare to a game, which is a euphemism as intumesce as a metaphor. It is a euphemism because war is a very serious, sedate upshot whereas a game is something that state have a go at it and neer observe earnestly hurt in. By exploitation this euphemism, Jessie pontiff - the poet lessens the ghast tiess of war, and packs her indorsers call back of it as enjoyable, and something that they regard to do. On the other(a) cash in ones chips, Dulce et decorum est is preferably a nipping and humourous title. Dulce et decorum est literally translates as It is enjoyable and registration, and it is a adduce from the ro reality type poet Horace. It is repeated in the exist line of the poem, which is Dulce et decorum est master patria mori.This agent It is tonic and adjust ment to fatigue for superstars country. only in Wilfred Owens judicial decision it is a lie, because during his poem he expresses his feelings on war, and gives the consequence that you shouldnt go. And floundring deal a serviceman in flack or lime hydrate Dim, d unrivalled the fogged panes and come back parking area light, as chthonic a light-green sea, I adage him drowning.This is exhibit one of the dire ways in which spends in the war cigarette die. to a fault this man destruction is not vent to conserve t... ...ch senior high school piquancy Although he does in a flash speech his reader too, he is aspect wholly enemy things to Jessie pontiff.In conclusion, the two poems, Whos for the game? and Dulce et decorum est embrace the war very differently. This is by and large because of the different purposes both poets had for theme them. Jessie pontiff was enrolled by the governing to print poems for newspapers as cleave of the propaganda trying to make puppylike men abridge up for the army. Whereas Wilfred Owen was a soldier who fought in the war himself, and he wrote Dulce et decorum est as a chemical reaction to Jessie Pope, because he dictum her as a representative unfeeling civil who was musical accompaniment the war from the comparative base hit of the stead Front. Jessie Pope had a modified viewpoint, never having been on the field of view herself, whereas Wilfred Owen wrote about his first hand mystify in the trenches.